WASHINGTON, November 4, 2025 – The United States has reportedly circulated a draft resolution at the United Nations Security Council (UNSC) proposing the establishment of a temporary International Security Force (ISF) in the Gaza Strip with a mandate of at least two years. The proposed force, described as an “enforcement force and not a peacekeeping force,” is intended to stabilize the security environment following the recent ceasefire agreement.
The draft resolution, which has been shared with several UNSC members, outlines a broad mission for the multinational force, including:
- Border Security: Securing Gaza’s borders with both Israel and Egypt.
- Demilitarization: Stabilizing the security environment by overseeing the demilitarization of the Gaza Strip, including the destruction of military infrastructure and the decommissioning of weapons from non-state armed groups.
- Civilian and Aid Protection: Protecting civilians and humanitarian corridors, and providing security for aid convoys.
- Police Training: Training a new Palestinian police service, with which the ISF would partner in its mission.
According to reports, the mandate would last until at least the end of 2027, with the possibility of extensions.
🗺️ Transitional Governance and Oversight
The ISF’s deployment would be carried out in consultation with a proposed “Board of Peace,” which would function as a transitional governance administration, overseeing civil affairs and reconstruction efforts until a reformed Palestinian Authority is ready to take over. A senior US official noted that the US aims for a Security Council vote within weeks, with initial contingents potentially deploying to Gaza by January.
🤝 Key Consultations and International Response
The proposed resolution mandates close consultation and cooperation with both Israel and Egypt in the ISF’s operations. The plan is part of the broader US-brokered Gaza Peace Agreement.
The initiative comes as Arab states, including Jordan and others, have been calling for a UN mandate to legitimize any international force in Gaza. However, some diplomatic friction remains over the nature of the force. Muslim-majority nations considering troop contributions have emphasized that their decisions will depend on the final, clearly defined mission and authority outlined in the UN resolution. Concerns have also been raised about the need for a timeline for a full Israeli withdrawal from Gaza alongside the ISF’s deployment.
The US proposal signals the most significant international effort yet to establish a concrete security framework for the post-conflict future of the enclave.
Would you like me to search for reactions from specific UN Security Council members or regional powers to this proposed resolution?
